Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1946Published

1Opinion of the Court

Decree affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Dowling and McCurn, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and for allowance of the claims as presented, in the following memorandum; The right of the infants to present and to prosecute the claims in question has not been challenged. (Kendall v. Kendall, 200 App. Div. 702, 704.) By failing to move for a dismissal of the claims on that ground, the objection has been waived. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 278.) After Mrs. Johnson (now Carry) sued her husband, Dr. Johnson, for an absolute divorce, and before the trial of that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Kernochan v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Yates v. YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Kendall v. KendallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. In re the Estate of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API