Feidler v. Motz
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Ellis District Court. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the case. Judgment for the defendant Motz, at the January term, 1887. The plaintiff Feidler comes to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Holt, C.:
The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, is and has been a resident of Pennsylvania; visiting this state in 1878, he placed a filing under the timber-culture law, upon the northwest quarter of section 26, town 17, range 18, Ellis county, and left the defendant as his agent in charge of the land. It was afterward taken by his agent, the defendant, in his own name, at the local land office, for the purpose, he says, of preventing it from being “jumped” by other parties. The plaintiff, in his petition, asked judgment for $800, the amount he says defendant received for…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hartwell v. Equitable Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Douville v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
- Custer v. RoyseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919