Legal Opinion

Currington v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 13, 2003No. A03A0448PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following his conviction by a jury of burglary and robbery, Deandre Currington appeals, arguing that the évidence was insufficient to support his convictions. Finding the evidence sufficient, we affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be construed in a light most favorable to the verdict, and the appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. An appellate court determines only the legal sufficiency of the evidence adduced below and does not weigh the evidence or assess the credibility of the witnesses. As long as there is some…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Norris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. David Gaines Gilmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API