Legal Opinion
People v. Dandron
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 3, 1976No. Docket 23737PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtD. C. Riley, J.
From a jury verdict of guilty of the charge of attempted breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny, MCLA 750.110; MSA 28.305, MCLA 750.92; MSA 28.287, defendant appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support the charged offense.
No one could contend that the evidence of guilt is overwhelming. However, our acknowledging that the prosecutor must rely heavily on circumstantial evidence is not a recognition that the case is weak. It is not. A patrolling policeman testified that he sighted two men — appellant and his brother — outside a doctor’s office at approximately…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. CowellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. SpannMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. HoffmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. SealsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. WolfordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. WackerleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MooneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.