Commonwealth v. Delgado
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
Following a jury trial, Appellant, William Delgado, was convicted of possession of cocaine, 1 possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, 2 and tampering with or fabricating physical evidence. 3 The trial court subsequently denied Delgado’s post-trial motions, and the Superior Court affirmed on the basis of the trial court’s opinion. Commonwealth v. Delgado, 435 Pa.Super. 620, 644 A.2d 804 (1994). We granted allowance of appeal in order to review the sufficiency of the evidence underlying Delgado’s conviction for tampering with or fabricating evidence. For the…
2Cited by23 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Ledarren S. HawkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. ComageIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. SharplessNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Vigue v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.