Lott v. State

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for robbery, with a prior conviction for an offense of like character alleged for enhancement; the punishment, life.

On a former appeal of this case, it was reversed on the ground that appellant’s arrest and search were unauthorized and the testimony relative thereto should not have been admitted in evidence. Lott v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 372 S.W.2d 325.

The appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.

The evidence in this case and in the former appeal (Lott v. State, supra) and in the companion case of Lucas v. State,…