Legal Opinion
Jalor Color Graphics, Inc. v. Universal Advertising Systems, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided September 30, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Orders dated December 27, 1999 and January 21, 2000 imposing part 130 (22 NYCRR 130-1.1) sanctions upon nonparty Fred Rosenberg affirmed, without costs.
Appeal from order dated December 27, 1999 denying defendant’s motion for an award of sanctions and other relief dismissed, without costs, as abandoned.
We consider the appeal on the merits even though nonparty appellant Rosenberg, defendant’s trial counsel, did not appeal the judgment that implemented the order he did appeal (CPLR 5501 [c]; see, Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242). Reaching the merits, we find no abuse of…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Estate of MarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Molinaro v. BedkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Estate of ScifoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Jalor Color Graphics, Inc. v. Universal Advertising System Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1999
- Jalor Color Graphics, Inc. v. Universal Advertising Systems, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002
4Cited by1 opinion
- Jalor Color Graphics, Inc. v. Universal Advertising Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003