Legal Opinion

Clements v. MacHeboeuf

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1876No. 120PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Colorado.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifford

Equity exercises jurisdiction in cases of accident, mistake, or fraud, where tbe party has not a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law. Where the remedy at law is plain, equity will not interfere if the remedy is also adequate and complete; but, if the remedy at law is doubtful, the court of equity will retain the case, and, if the proofs are satisfactory, will grant relief.

Jurisdiction to a partial extent may exist at law; but, if the remedy there is not adequate, —that is, if the party cannot attain at law the full justice of the case, — be may, if be sees fit, pursue bis remedy in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Polk's Lessee v. WendalSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  3. Very v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Vail v. McKernanIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Morrill v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. Robert Calvin Boyette v. Eugene S. Lefevre, Superintendent, Franklin Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Freeman v. BlountSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Great Western Sugar Co. v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Fluehr v. Paolino (In Re Paolino)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API