Legal Opinion

Phinizy v. Augusta & K. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided May 16, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity. Bill to foreclose 'a mortgage, and for the appointment of a receiver.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMQNTOK, District Judge.

The hill was filed by Charles H. Phinizy and Alfred Baker, trustees, against the Augusta & Knoxville Railroad Company and the Port Royal & Western Carolina Railway Company, for foreclosure of mortgage, praying the appointment of a receiver.

The Augusta & Knoxville Railroad Company, whose road extended from Augusta, in the state of Georgia, to Greenwood, in the state *274of South. Carolina, — a distance of nearly 70 miles, — was incorporated under acts of assembly of the state of South Carolina. It was also incorporated under an act of assembly of the state of Georgia. On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Kerrison v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Nashua and Lowell Railroad v. Boston and Lowell RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Guardian Trust Co. v. White Cliffs Portland Cement & Chalk Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1901
  2. Old Colony Trust Co. v. City of WichitaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1903
  3. Equitable Trust Co. of New York v. Port Wentworth Terminal Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1922
  4. State Trust Co. of New York v. National Land Imp. & Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1893
  5. State Nat. Bank of Denison v. Syndicate Co. of Eureka SpringsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API