Legal Opinion
Richard W. Staab v. Robert A. McDonald
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided April 8, 2016No. 14-0957PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREENBERG, Judge:
This is a case of statutory interpretation. The appellant, Richard W. Staab, appeals through counsel a December 6, 2013, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision that denied entitlement to reimbursement of medical expenses incurred for emergency medical services provided at non-VA medical facilities from December 27, 2010, through December 31, 2011. Record (R.) at 3-9. The appellant argues that the Board erred in finding him ineligible for reimbursement under 38 U.S.C. § 1725 because (1) under the plain meaning of the statute, the partial coverage of his medical expenses…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wolfe v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Am Anda Jane Wolfe and P Eter E. Boerschinger Individually and on Behalf of Others Sim Ilarly Situated v. Denis McDonoughUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2021
- Amanda Jane Wolfe and Peter E. Boerschinger v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2019
- Conley F. Monk, Jr. v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2018
- Douglas J. Rosinski v. David J. ShulkinUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.