Legal Opinion

Patricinio D.M.V. v. Todd Blanche, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 21, 2026No. 1:26-cv-06750Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 PATRICINIO D.M.V.,1 13 Petitioner, No. 1:26-cv-06750-TLN-CSK 14 v. A# 201-581-729 15 ORDER TODD BLANCHE, et al., 16 Respondents. 17 18 19 This matter is before the Court on pro se Petitioner Patricinio D.M.V.’s (“Petitioner”) 20 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“the Petition”). (ECF No. 1.) Respondents filed an 21 opposition and supplement. (ECF Nos. 6, 10.) For the reasons set forth below, the Petition is 22 GRANTED and Respondents are ordered to IMMEDIATELY RELEASE Petitioner. 23 /// 24 /// 25 1 The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API