Legal Opinion

Seeley Tube & Box Co. v. Manning

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 20, 1948No. 9693PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit by a taxpayer to get back some money from the Government. The taxpayer was entitled to a refund for taxes paid in 1941.1 It was repaid $40,384.66 and the Government kept back $4513.34 which it claimed as interest upon an alleged deficiency. The District Court denied relief to the taxpayer who, therefore, seeks help here.

The point of the case can best he understood if non-technically stated, leaving statutory references and the like for footnote elaboration. The taxpayer paid the tax it thought due for income and excess profits for 1941. Later…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Colorado Milling & Elevator Co. v. HowbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  2. Big Diamond Mills Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
  4. Phelps v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Estate of Bahr v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. McMahonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  4. Hastings & Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Bankcard America, Inc. v. Universal Bancard System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API