Legal Opinion · Dissent

Donna M. Murillo v. W. Lewis Bambrick, Clerk of the Superior Court of New Jersey

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 17, 1982No. 81-1786Published

1DissentSloviter, Circuit Judge

I would affirm the judgment of the district court that the fees held in escrow by defendant be refunded with interest to the individuals who had deposited them because I believe that the statute pursuant to which they were collected violates the Equal Protection Clause.

The district court concluded that New Jersey’s matrimonial fee system neither employed any suspect classification nor impinged on any fundamental right, and therefore it used the rational basis standard in its constitutional analysis. Murillo v. Bambrick, 508 F.Supp. 830, 833 (D.N.J.1981). The district court correctly held that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API