Standard Oil Co. v. Buchi
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On order to show cause why an injunction should not issue. Heard on bill and affidavits.
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney, Advisory Master.
The object of the bill is to obtain judicial restraint preventing the defendants from interfering, by strong hand and serious threats of violence, with the complainant’s work in laying across the lands of the defendant in Bergen county a line of pipe for the transportation of oil.
At and just before the filing of the bill the complainant had placed on the premises of the defendant a number of joints of pipe, and had leaded them together,, ready to be buried beneath the earth, and its workmen were about to excavate a trench for that purpose when they were driven from the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mayor, Aldermen & Commonalty v. George LawNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Sked v. Pennington Spring Water Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- Patterson v. Chambers Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Strauch v. Coastal States Crude Gathering Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Kerlin v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Tewksbury Tp. v. Jersey Cent. Power & Light Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.