Legal Opinion
Zack v. City of Minneapolis
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 9, 1985No. Civ. 4-82-1465PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of Oakes & Kanatz, plaintiff’s original counsel in the above-entitled action, for establishment of an attorneys’ lien pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 481.13. Plaintiff has responded to this motion with her own motion for attorneys’ fees under Minn.Stat. § 549.21.
FACTS
Plaintiff Susan Zack retained the law firm of Oakes & Kanatz in November of 1980 to represent her in an employment discrimination claim against the City of Minneapolis. Oakes & Kanatz claims that plaintiff entered into an express agreement with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wicker v. HoppockSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Dorothy C. Parker v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ryther v. KARE 11District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997