Legal Opinion

Doell v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1999No. SC S46311; SC S46311, S46312PublishedCited by 8 opinions

(Consolidated for Argument and Opinion)

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

In these consolidated ballot title review proceedings, petitioner Lawler, a chief sponsor of a proposed initiative measure, and petitioner Doell, an elector, seek review of a ballot title certified by the Attorney General for that proposed measure. Because both petitioners submitted timely written comments on the draft ballot title as provided by ORS 250.067(1), they are entitled to seek this court’s review of the certified ballot title. ORS 250.085(2). Our task is to determine whether the Attorney General’s certified ballot title complies substantially with the statutory requirements. See…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Witt v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Peppers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hamilton v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Burbidge v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Earls v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dirks v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Novick v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Novick v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Earls v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API