Legal Opinion

Smith v. Groves

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Broady, J. •cited: Hollingsworth v. Flint, 101 U. S., 591. Johnston v. Jones, 1 Black (U. S.), 209. MoCool v. Smith, 1 Black {U. S.), 459. Hardy v. Johnson, 1 Wall. (U. S.), 371. Dawson v. Porter, 2 Ohio, 305. Axtell v. Worden, 7 Neb., 186. B. & M. Pt.B.

Read the full summary

Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Broady, J. •cited: Hollingsworth v. Flint, 101 U. S., 591. Johnston v. Jones, 1 Black (U. S.), 209. MoCool v. Smith, 1 Black {U. S.), 459. Hardy v. Johnson, 1 Wall. (U. S.), 371. Dawson v. Porter, 2 Ohio, 305. Axtell v. Worden, 7 Neb., 186. B. & M. Pt.B. Qo. v. Dobson, 17 Neb., 450. Sully v. Huehl, 30 Iowa, 278. Slack v. Wood, 9 Grattan, 40. Taliaferro’s Adm’r v. Bank, 23 Ala., 755. ' Orozier v. Cooper, 14 111., 141. Butler v. Vassault, 40-Cal., 74. Duncan v. Dyon, 3 Johns. Ch., 356. Richards v. Nuckolls, 19 Iowa, 555. . Carson…

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Ch. J.

This is a proceeding in error to the district court of Gage county. The petition was filed in that court, under *547■the provisions of section 318 of the civil code, for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, which ■defendant in error could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial. The former action was in ejectment, instituted by plaintiff in error for the possession of the east half of the south-east quarter of ¡section number two, of township number five north, of range number seven east, and in which action he was suc■cessful. It…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. PoormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christensen v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API