Legal Opinion

In Re MacDonald

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided October 31, 2006No. 04-2764 BBD, 04-2766 BBD, 04-2979 BBD, 04-2765 BBDPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AFFIRMING BANKRUPTCY COURT’S JUDGMENT IN IN RE MACDONALD AND IN RE THOMPSON AND REVERSING AND REMANDING BANKRUPTCY COURT’S JUDGMENT IN IN RE JORDAN

DONALD, District Judge.

Before the Court are four appeals from the judgments of the United States Bank ruptcy Court for the Western District of Tennessee in three separate bankruptcy cases. Because each of these appeals confronts the same fundamental legal issue, and because the relevant facts are nearly identical in the three cases, the Court has consolidated the four appeals in the interest of judicial economy. The Court herein affirms the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. 700 TrustUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2025
  3. 700 TrustUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  4. Thompson v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API