Legal Opinion

Guillermo Acosta and Jose Molina v. Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier, LLC

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided February 28, 2025No. 08-24-00099-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-24-00099-CV GUILLERMO ACOSTA and JOSE MOLINA, § Appeal from the Appellants, § 261st District Court v. § of Travis County, Texas UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and (TC# D-1-GN-24-001726) RASIER, LLC, § Appellees. § MEMORANDUM OPINION1 This case involves a car accident that occurred on a trip arranged through a ride-sourcing cell phone application owned and operated by Appellees Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC2 (collectively, Uber). Passengers on that trip, Guillermo Acosta and Jose Molina (collectively, Riders3), allege they…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Timpte Industries, Inc. v. GishTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API