Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 6, 1963No. [No. 312, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, J.

On this appeal appellant’s sole contention is that judgments and sentences of twenty years and five years, to run consecutively, were illegal in that they exceeded the total sentences imposed in 1947 at his original trial, this second trial being a new one, the result of appellant’s habeas corpus efforts in the federal courts.

On January 7, 1947, appellant pleaded guilty to three charges of robbery with a deadly weapon and was sentenced to twenty years on each charge, the sentences to run concurrently. Since that time, he has filed forty-eight petitions for relief in both state and federal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apple v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. State v. D'ONOFRIOCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Glickman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Levine v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  5. Baltimore County v. Missouri Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. West v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. United States v. HoffeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. State v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. BargerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API