Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claudio v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1981Published

1DissentSilverman, J.

I would reverse the judgment appealed from and order a new trial as to the claim against New York City Housing Authority. It is clear to me that plaintiff was an ad hoc employee of the Housing Authority. While plaintiff was paid by the city’s South Bronx Neighborhood Youth Corps under the Human Resources Administration he was sent by that agency to work on the Housing Authority’s premises with the Housing Authority’s Children’s Program, under the supervision of Mr. Marshall, an employee of the Housing Authority. The city in no way supervised or controlled plaintiff’s work for the Housing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Adam Hat Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Mitchell v. Adam Hat Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API