Legal Opinion
Luneau v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Ins. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 2, 1986No. 85-167PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOLL, Judge.
In this worker’s compensation case, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Insurance Company (Hartford) appeals the trial court’s finding that Alfred T. Luneau (Lu-neau) suffered a work-related accident. Hartford contends that the trial court committed manifest error in finding a causal connection between Luneau’s heart condition and the work place. We affirm, finding that the record supports the trial court’s factual determinations that established causation, therefore, the trial court did not commit manifest error.
FACTS
Luneau, 59 years of age, was self-employed as owner and chief…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Prim v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Guidry v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Guillory v. US Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Roussel v. Colonial Sugars CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Boren v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shailow v. Gulf Coast Social ServicesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Lois J. Shailow v. Gulf Coast Social ServicesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Luneau v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986