Legal Opinion

Maurin v. Chambers

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1843PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Rapides, King, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The defendant is appellant from a judgment on his promissory note. He pleaded, that it was given for the purchase of a tract of land from G. & F. Chretien, who endorsed the note to the plaintiff; that he is in danger of being evicted, a suit having been brought, and being still pending against him for that purpose ; that the note is not negotiable on its face ; and that the plaintiff knew there was a suit brought against the defendant for the land.

It is true, that the note states on its face that the consideration of it was the purchase of a tract of land from G. & F. Chretien, who endorsed…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Times Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Offshore Crewboats, Inc. v. HarredgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Bank of Eudora v. CroweLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. AdamsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API