Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Woldemichael

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 22, 2022No. 4:21-cv-05079Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ORLANDO GARCIA, Case No. 21-cv-05079-DMR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT 10 TEGSTI WOLDEMICHAEL, Re: Dkt. No. 31 11 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff Orlando Garcia filed a complaint against Defendant Tegsti Woldemichael, owner 14 of La Dolce Vita, an establishment in Oakland, California. Garcia alleges that Woldemichael 15 violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),

42 U.S.C. § 12101

et seq. and the Unruh 16 Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code section 51 et seq. Woldemichael previously…

2Cases cited34 opinions

Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.