Legal Opinion
Hill County v. Bryant & Huffman
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1929No. 4242PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson
' The Court of Civil Appeals states the case as follows:
“The legislature, in 1919, passed a law ‘creating a more efficient road system for Hill County.’ Said act provided for the voting of bonds by the county or any political subdivision thereof for the purpose of building permanent roads, and provides that if bonds shall be voted the money derived from the sale of the bonds, ‘after deducting fixed charges, shall be expended only in the subdivision or defined district from which it is collected, for the maintenance of the permanent roads after their construction, and of such other roads and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hill v. SterrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Lyons v. Texorado Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Corporation of President of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
- Brammer Wilder v. Limeston CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Garwood Irrigation Co. v. Lower Colorado River AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.