Legal Opinion · Dissent

Guthrie v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1984No. F-83-51Published

1DissentBrett, Judge

I respectfully dissent to this decision, notwithstanding the fact that the affidavit for search warrant and the search warrant are not contained in the original record.1 After having read the transcript of testimony, I would grant appellant a new trial.

I

It is clear that the search warrant was issued on the basis of two facts: The Highway Patrol aircraft pilot radioed that there *281was a field “similar” to the field on C.O. Guthrie’s land. C.O. Guthrie is the brother of appellant and marijuana stubble was found to exist on C.O.'s farm, and some marijuana was also apparently found. Secondly,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marlow v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Hagler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API