Legal Opinion
People v. Carracedo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 11, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal from this judgment was held in abeyance after we remanded to the Supreme Court for a de novo combined Wadel Mappl Huntley hearing (People v Carracedo, 214 AD2d 404 [Murphy, P. J., and Tom, J., dissenting in a mem by Tom, J.]). That hearing has now been concluded with a denial of defendant’s suppression motion and defendant has not chosen to pursue an appeal from that determination. In our prior decision we found that the suppression court’s order banning consultation between defendant and his counsel during an overnight recess was in violation of defendant’s Sixth Amendment right…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BanchNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. ArroyoNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. HydeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. CarracedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. WardlawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Carracedo v. ArtuzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- People v. D'AntuonoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.