Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of Rolling Hills Estates
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tem. *
Petition for writ of mandate was brought by plaintiffs to prevent annexations of territory by defendants City of Rolling Hills Estates et al., by virtue of its proposed Annexation Nos. 7, 8 and 10, and test the validity of the refusal by the Los Angeles County Boundary Commission to accept for filing a proposal for incorporation of the new City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Following issuances of alternative writs a trial was had, resulting in a judgment for defendants and a dissolving of the alternative writs and stay orders. Plaintiffs appeal from this judgment.
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Board of Education v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Los Angeles v. City of ArtesiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1990