Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.

There was a conviction under an indictment for grand larceny. The amended record filed in this court *423disposes of the objection urged by the appellant that the record did not show the indictment to have been returned by a grand jury regularly impanneled.

An exception was taken on the trial to the giving of the following instruction: “1. It is a settled principle that voluntary drunkenness is not an excuse for a criminal act committed while the intoxication lasts, and being its immediate result. Such drunkenness is, in itself, a wrongful act, for the immediate consequences of which the law will…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aszman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State KidwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. State v. KoernerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  5. McAleer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API