Attorney General v. Public Service Commission No 2

In its basic underlying facts and legal issues, the present case is indistinguishable from Attorney General v Public Service Comm No 1, 171 Mich App 696; — NW2d — (1988), which is also released herewith. To the extent the issues in the two cases are identical, what was said in this Court’s opinion in that case applies here and need not be repeated.

The only difference in the two cases is that here the Attorney General argues that the 1983 minimum bill payment involved, in excess of $20 million, was not reasonably and prudently incurred, as required by § 6h(12) and (14) of the Public Service…