Legal Opinion

Delancey Stockton Corp. v. Reliable, C., Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 17, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts appear sufficiently in the Chancery opinion. The points presented here by the appellant are that Chancery should not have adjudicated the issues summarily, and that even on that method of hearing the appellant should have prevailed. Our consideration of the case leads us to the conclusion that the Vice-Chancellor was correct in his appraisal of the facts and in the application of the law to the meritorious issue. We affirm for the reasons stated by him. The petition by the Reliable Improvement Company was filed in, and was entitled in, an existing cause, namely, "In the Matter of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Orange Society of New Jerusalem v. KonskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  2. Orange Society v. KonskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  3. Lazarus v. Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Milmar Estate, Inc. v. Borough of Fort LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Jala Corp. v. Berkeley Savings & Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. NJ Highway Auth. v. Henry A. Raemsch Coal Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. In Re AppropriationOhio Court of Appeals · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API