Legal Opinion
AMR Services Corp. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 22, 1987No. 87 C 1144PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, AMR Services Corporation (AMR), brought this action under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., and pendent state law, seeking an injunction and damages. AMR has moved for a preliminary injunction restraining defendants from picketing allegedly in violation of section 2, Ninth, of the Railway Labor Act. 45 U.S.C. § 152, Ninth.
Most of the relevant facts are set forth in this court’s memorandum and order dated March 30, 1987, entered in the related case of Blyer v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Milk Wagon Drivers' Union, Local No. 753 v. Lake Valley Farm Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Central Vermont Railway, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- AMR Services Corp. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Local 851, International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Amr Services Corporation Amr) v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters IbtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987