Legal Opinion

Wilson v. . the Genesee Mutual Insurance Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1856PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] One of the provisions of the policy was, that if the insured or his assigns should obtain any other insurance on the same property the policy should be void, unless within a reasonable time the additional insurance should be notified to the company and indorsed on the instrument, or otherwise approved in writing. A subsequent insurance for $2000 having been procured from another company, it is conceded that the policy in question is void, unless the condition…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arff v. Star Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Laclede Fire-Brick Manuf'g Co. v. Hartford Steam-Boiler Inspection & Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  3. Healey v. Imperial Fire InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Burlington Insurance v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  5. Rowley v. Empire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API