Ex Parte Adams
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Presiding Judge.
These proceedings involve an application for writ of habeas corpus brought under the provisions of Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. See Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex. Cr.App.1967).
Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery upon his plea of guilty before the court and his punishment was assessed at 25 years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. In his habeas corpus application he alleged his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily or intelligently made as he did not have effective assistance of counsel. In essence, applicant alleged that as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Ex Parte McWilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Ex Parte MorrowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ex Parte AdamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Ex Parte EllisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Briddle v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Ex Parte PoolCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.