Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Adams

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 16, 1986No. 69585PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

These proceedings involve an application for writ of habeas corpus brought under the provisions of Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. See Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex. Cr.App.1967).

Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery upon his plea of guilty before the court and his punishment was assessed at 25 years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. In his habeas corpus application he alleged his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily or intelligently made as he did not have effective assistance of counsel. In essence, applicant alleged that as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ex Parte YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Ex Parte McWilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MorrowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Ex Parte AdamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Ex Parte EllisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Briddle v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Ex Parte PoolCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API