Legal Opinion

Maury v. Unruh

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 23, 1930No. 1 Div. 565PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This appeal is by the plaintiff for a judgment of nonsuit, superinduced by the several orders of the trial court sustaining the defendant’s demurrers to the several counts of the complaint, and is authorized by section 6431 of the Code. Herrmann v. Mobile County, 202 Ala. 274, 80 So. 112.

Count 1 as last amended, and counts 2, 3, 4, and 6, are special counts partaking of the nature of indebitatus assumpsit, to recover one-third of the purchase money for an interest in lands. The basis of these counts is a contract in writing whereby J. E. Hammel covenanted to sell and defendant to purchase…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of Columbia v. HagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Scharfenburg v. Town of New DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Obermark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Prichard v. MulhallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Freeman v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Health Science Products, Inc. v. Taylor (In Re Health Science Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
  2. Cay v. FerrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Herring v. PrestwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Barksdale v. TemersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Coral Gables, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API