Legal Opinion

Ocasio v. Konesky

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided November 1, 2011No. 10-CV-6201LPublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Omar Ocasio, appearing pro se, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”) alleges that his constitutional rights were violated in 2009, at which time he was confined at Wende Correctional Facility.

In his original complaint, which was filed in April 2010, plaintiff sued over two dozen DOCS employees, alleging a wide, if ill-defined, variety of claims against them, arising out of events that took place over a period of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Graham v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Dawes v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. Flaherty v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Guarneri v. WestDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API