Legal Opinion

American Surety Co. v. Thach

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1919No. 6093PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Milam County Court; W. G. Gillis, Judge. ' Action by the American Surety Company against J. T. Thach. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKey, C. J.

The American Surety Company brought this suit against J. T. Thach, seeking to recover the sum of $400 and interest, alleged to be owing by the defendant because of the fact that the plaintiff, as surety for the defendant, had incurred liability to that extent on account of the default of the defendant.

The defendant’s answer contained a number of special exceptions and general denial, but contained no plea asking for affirmative relief. The judgment contains recitals to the effect that, when the case was regularly called for trial, the plaintiff did not appear, but the defendant appeared and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burger v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Drummond v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. Herrera, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  3. Beasley v. KeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. State of Texas, Cities of San Antonio and Balcones Heights, Texas And Transit Authority of San Antonio v. Arthur L. Herrera, Jr., D/B/A Nicole's Diamond Creations, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API