Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Castro

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. H-13-1242PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.

Pending before the Court in the above referenced putative collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., to recover unpaid overtime wages and compensation for hours worked but not recorded or paid (“off-the-clock”), liquidated damages, attorney’s fees, costs, and post-judgment interest,1 are the following motions: (1) Plaintiff Daniel M. Diaz’s (“Diaz’s”) motion for conditional class certification (instrument # 12); (2) Plaintiffs motion to strike Defendant Felipe Sandoval Castro d/b/a Castro Contractor’s…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elkins Ph D v. WernzDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
  2. Moon v. USP BeaumontDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API