Legal Opinion

Mohr & Sons v. Mattox

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 12, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Money rule. Before Judge Parker. Ckarlbon superior court. January 5, 1904.-

1Opinion of the Court

EváNS, J.

L. Mobr & Sons obtained a rule nisi against H. S. Mattox, sheriff of Charlton county, calling on him to show cause why he should not pay the money due on two certain fi. fas. in favor of movants and against M. M. Dixon. Movant’s petition alleged that the fi. fas. were delivered to the sheriff on May 29th, 1903, with instructions to make a levy on certain property pointed ■out by the movants’ attorneys; that after having repeatedly urged the sheriff to levy upon the defendant’s property, the sheriff, on July 30th, 1903, did levy upon a sufficiency of the defendant’s property to pay…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. McKenney v. CheneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Armour Packing Co. v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Hunter v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  5. French, Richards & Co. v. KempSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fischer v. Pauline Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Morris Plan Bank of Georgia v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Farmers & Traders' Bank v. University Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Ricks v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Ford v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API