Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Payano

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2009No. 2007AP1042-CRPublished

1DissentAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 108. {dissenting). Without even laying eyes on a piece of evidence that the prosecutor referred to as "the heart of this case," the majority purports to balance the probative value of Kojis' other acts testimony and its prejudicial effect.

¶ 109. I refer to a tape of the 911 call Payano placed after he fired the shot that injured the officer and before he was apprehended in his bathroom. It is difficult to imagine a piece of evidence more probative of Payano's mental state than an audio recording of that call. Yet, where is the tape? What was said during that call? The majority notes that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. PayanoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API