Legal Opinion
Darden v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the circuit court of Warren county. IIon. H. C. Mounger, Judge. Suit by G. T. Darden against the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff for an insufficient amount, he appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
In June, 1912, appellee executed and delivered a schedule. policy of insurance covering fourteen different items, and specifically indemnifying the assured against loss by fire for the amount specified and the property described under each separate item. The policy, Exhibit'A to the declaration, insures—
“against all direct loss or damage by fire, except as hereinafter provided, to an amount not exceeding forty-four hundred and 00/100 dollars, to the following described property while located and contained as described herein and not elsewhere, to wit:
“Policy Form for Cotton Gins.
1. On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Havens v. Germania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Mississippi Home Insurance v. BarronMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. ShlenkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scottish Union & National Insurance v. Warren Gee Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1918
- Claxton v. Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1937
- Export Ins. Co. v. AxeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Eagle Cotton Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
- Hayes v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2019