Legal Opinion

People v. Rose

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided December 13, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

*687OPINION OF THE COURT

Frank P. Nervo, J.

It is ordered that defendant’s motion to dismiss the information for facial insufficiency (CPL 100.40; 170.30) is granted and the information is dismissed, and it is further ordered that the remainder of the motion, requests for Mapp, Huntley and Sandoval hearings and for discovery is denied as academic, and it is further ordered that, on the court’s own motion, sealing is stayed for a period of 30 days from the date of this order.

Defendant moves to dismiss the information charging defendant with a violation of Penal Law § 275.35, failure to disclose the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. KaneCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API