Legal Opinion

State v. Acton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 7, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The indictment charges embezzlement. A former indictment based on the same general facts was quashed by this court on the ground that “there was nothing to indicate whether the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, named as the owner of the money alleged to have been embezzled, was a corporation, a social organization, or other entity.” State v. Acton, 8 N. J. Mis. R. 198; 149 Atl. Rep. 339. Thereupon the present indictment was found. It charges that the defendant, on the 30th day of July, in the year of our Lord 1928, at the city aforesaid, in the county of Salem aforesaid,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jersey Bond, C., Co. v. Wesp Bldg. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. State v. RuffuSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  3. State v. ActonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. State v. SullivanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. State v. WinneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API