Loud v. Winchester
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Iosco. (Tuttle, J.) Bill to enforce trust. Complainant and defendant Winchester appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
The object of the bill in this case is to protect complainant’s interest as beneficiary under a trust, covering timbered lands and other lumbering property and business connected with it, on the ground of denial of his rights and various acts detrimental to the objects of .the trust. Belief was granted to the extent of declaring the trust and ordering an accounting, as well as fixing salaries and regulating some matters of administration, reserving *178further equities. Complainant appeals because the decree does not go far enough in some directions, and Winchester appeals generally. The other…
2Cited by10 opinions
- State v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Sloane v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Roberts v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Lyman v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Pennsylvania Company v. Wilmington Trust CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.