Legal Opinion

Porter Brothers, Inc. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 29, 1985No. 0377PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Judge:

This is an action by respondent Porter Brothers, Inc. to recover for goods sold appellant-Marion Smith d/b/a Smith Lawn and Garden. The trial judge directed a verdict for respondent holding Smith liable for the debt under the guaranty clause of their dealership agreement. We affirm.

The dealership agreement, entered and signed by Smith in 1978 states:(1) We and each of us do hereby jointly and severally guarantee payment of any debt now due or that becomes due to Porter Brothers, Inc., which arose or may arise out of the operation of such dealership, and/or the purchase of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Hardware Supply Co., Inc. v. WhitmireSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Jones v. BroomeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wayne Dalton Corp. v. Acme Doors, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Soaper v. Hope Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API