Legal Opinion

Estate of Martin Kuntz, Sr., Deceased, Isabelle M. Kuntz, and Isabelle M. Kuntz, Individually, Surviving Wife v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1962No. 14584_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNTON, District Judge.

The only question on this review of the decision of the Tax Court is whether the one determinative finding of fact by the Tax Court is “clearly erroneous.” All the findings of fact contained in the Memorandum Decision of the Tax Court are findings of fact based on undisputed or conceded facts. None, save the determinative one above adverted to, constitutes the resolution of any factual issue. In ascertaining what standard is to be applied for the purpose of “clearly er roneous” we are not without definitive guidance. Section 7482 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. Hazel B. Kasynski, Formerly Hazel B. AinsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Reed v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1959

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Eva L. Gaugler, on Behalf of Herself and as Under the Last Will and Testament of Raymond C. Gaugler, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Mildred W. Smith v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. Genevieve E. Frankel, of the Estate of Samuel F. Frankel, Deceased, and Genevieve E. FrankelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  4. Nell W. Carson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Evans v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API