Legal Opinion
People v. Thomas
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 1996PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
We affirm for the reasons stated by Presiding Justice Mangano at the Appellate Division (213 AD2d 73). We add that our decision in People v Smith (87 NY2d 715) is not to the contrary. Smith stands for a different and more limited proposition involving waiver of inquiry with respect to pending criminal charges on an unrelated matter.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Dalton v. Harleysville Worcester Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- People v. BrimsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. A. J. RutledgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.