Legal Opinion

State v. Stoddard

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1983No. 14086PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

The sole question presented is whether a district court erred by denying a criminal defendant’s motion for declaration of a mistrial. The defendant, Daniel Wayne Stoddard, ultimately was found guilty by a jury of stealing an automobile. Judgment of conviction was entered upon the charge of grand larceny. Because Stoddard had two prior felony convictions, the judgment also contained an adjudication that he was a persistent violator of law under I.C. § 19-2514.

At trial a police officer testified that keys to the stolen car had been found in Stoddard’s possession, affixed to a key…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Payne v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. LovelaceIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. PalinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. StoddardIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API