Legal Opinion

Sobel v. Adams

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 5, 1962No. Civ. Nos. 182-62-M, 186-62-MPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

In these cases, here consolidated, like questions are presented and the same relief is sought. They come before us on final hearing. By the facts stipulated and those of which we take judicial notice it clearly appears, and the Court finds, that the existing provisions of the Constitution and statutes of the State of Florida which relate to the apportionment for the nomination and election of the members of the Senate and House of Representatives of the Legislature of Florida are invidiously discriminatory against the plaintiffs in the within causes and against others…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Keggin v. County of HillsboroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  4. Otis W. Shiver v. R. A. Gray, Secretary of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Landry v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
  2. Sincock v. DuffyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1963
  3. Dade County Classroom Teachers Association, Inc. v. LegislatureSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Butterworth v. DempseyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
  5. In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176Supreme Court of Florida · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API