Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Bahlhorn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Proceedings to recover possession of land. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.,

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

In this case a complaint was made before a circuit court commissioner to recover possession of a farm, situated in the township of Brownstown,' Wayne county. *88Complainants alleged the relation of landlord and tenant existing between the parties, and an unlawful holding by the defendants. Defendants pleaded not guilty. Upon a trial, the commissioner gave judgment for the defendants.

Upon appeal to the Wayne circuit court, Circuit Judge F. H. Chambers made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, and entered, judgment for complainants:

Findings of Fact.

“David Wallace entered into a…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lunke v. EgelandMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hughes v. DonlonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Fox v. ADRIAN REALTY COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Turner v. GortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Stender v. KerreosMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API